“We need to get educated”: lessons from physicians certifying cannabis as an alternative to opioids in the Illinois Opioid Alternative Patient Program.

A survey of Illinois physicians participating in the state’s Opioid Alternative Patient Program revealed that cannabis as opioid alternative physician education remains a critical need. Even early adopter clinicians emphasized educational gaps as a primary implementation barrier, highlighting broader challenges in integrating cannabis medicine into clinical practice.

Read More

What Federal Cannabis Rescheduling Means for Care

Cannabis Schedule III rescheduling marks a major shift in how cannabis is classified and understood at the federal level. This change begins to align policy with clinical reality, affecting research, documentation, and patient access. Cannabis Schedule III rescheduling does not solve every clinical challenge, but it opens the door to more structured and evidence-driven care.

Read More

Contentious legality in decentralized governance: The rise and decline of cannabis social clubs in Spain.

A comprehensive policy analysis reveals how Spanish cannabis social clubs legal framework exploited legal ambiguities to create community-based alternatives to illicit markets. The study demonstrates how grassroots activism and strategic legal interpretation temporarily created contested spaces for collective cannabis activities before regulatory closure. This research offers insights into cannabis policy reform through social mobilization rather than legislative action.

Read More

What the DOJ Cannabis Order Means for Patients and Clinicians

The medical cannabis Schedule III order is a major federal policy change, but it is not the same as new clinical proof. This Evidence Watch explains what the DOJ action may mean for research access, patient care, and regulated medical cannabis programs. It also clarifies what Schedule III does not show about cannabis safety, dosing, or effectiveness for specific conditions.

Read More