Characterizing public comments via Regulations.gov in response to proposed cannabis rescheduling in the United States.
| Journal | Addiction (Abingdon, England) |
| Study Type | Clinical Study |
| Population | Human participants |
This item covers developments relevant to cannabis medicine and clinical practice. Clinicians monitoring evidence in this area should review the source material.
The United States Drug Enforcement Administration’s (DEA) proposed rescheduling of cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act marks a significant shift in federal policy. Understanding public sentiment toward this policy is critical for guiding the current cannabis rescheduling effort as well as future reforms. The objective of this study is to characterize public comments submitted to Regulations.gov regarding the DEA’s cannabis rescheduling proposal and identify underlying justifications for support or opposition. A mixed-methods analysis was conducted. Online public comments submitted to Regulations.gov regarding the DEA’s cannabis rescheduling proposal. 42 913 public comments submitted between 21 May and 22 July 2024. Comments were analyzed for sentiment towards the proposed rescheduling (support, oppose or insufficient rescheduling) and thematic justifications using manual and automated natural language processing techniques. A two-stage annotatio
“This is a development worth tracking. The clinical implications will become clearer as more evidence accumulates.”
💬 Join the Conversation
Have a question about how this applies to your situation? Ask Dr. Caplan →
Want to discuss this topic with other patients and caregivers? Join the forum discussion →
Have thoughts on this? Share it:
FAQ
What change to cannabis scheduling did the DEA propose?
The DEA proposed moving cannabis from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act, a change the article describes as a significant shift in federal policy. This study looked at how the public responded to that proposal through comments submitted on Regulations.gov.
What were the researchers trying to learn from the public comments?
The study aimed to characterize the public comments submitted to Regulations.gov about the DEA’s rescheduling proposal and to identify the underlying reasons people gave for supporting or opposing it. The authors frame understanding public sentiment as critical for guiding both the current rescheduling effort and future reforms.
How many public comments were analyzed, and when were they submitted?
The study analyzed 42,913 online public comments submitted to Regulations.gov between 21 May and 22 July 2024, all responding to the DEA’s cannabis rescheduling proposal. These comments formed the data set for the study’s mixed-methods analysis.
How were the public comments sorted and analyzed?
Each comment was classified by its sentiment toward the proposal: support, oppose, or insufficient rescheduling. Comments were also coded for the themes people used to justify their positions. The researchers used both manual and automated natural language processing techniques as part of a mixed-methods analysis.
