Overview
A CRS analysis suggests the FDA and DEA ‘may lack the resources to broadly enforce’ the new hemp prohibitions. If intoxicating hemp products persist after Nov 2026, they could face the same issues as marijuana: banking restrictions, interstate commerce limits, and federal prosecution exposure—though the likelihood remains uncertain. The parallel to state-legal cannabis is striking: despite Schedule I status, federal response has largely been to allow states to implement their own laws.
Clinical Perspective
⚖️ WILL THE BAN EVEN BE ENFORCED?
A Congressional Research Service analysis raises a critical question:
⚖️ FDA and DEA ‘may lack the resources to broadly enforce’ the new prohibitions
🌿 If hemp products persist post-Nov, they face marijuana-like limbo
⚖️ Banking restrictions apply
🔹 Interstate commerce limited
🔹 ️ Federal prosecution possible—but unlikely
The parallel to marijuana is striking: ‘the federal response has largely been to allow states to implement their own laws.’
Uncertainty is the cruelest form of regulation.
Have thoughts on this? Share it: