`Cannabinoid Clinical Trials: Cannabis for Chronic Back Pain`

Clinical Takeaway

In this phase 3 randomized controlled trial of 820 adults, the full-spectrum cannabis extract VER-01 was evaluated against placebo over 12 weeks for chronic low back pain, with follow-up extending to 12 months. This represents one of the most rigorously designed clinical trials of a cannabis-based medicine for a condition affecting over half a billion people globally, where existing drug options remain limited and often poorly tolerated.

#2 Full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 for chronic low back pain: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.

Citation: Karst Matthias et al.. Full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 for chronic low back pain: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.. Nature medicine. 2025. PMID: 41023483.

Study type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Multicenter Study  |  Topic area: Pain  |  CED Score: 14

Design: 5 Journal: 4 N: 2 Recency: 2 Pop: 2 Human: 1 Risk: -2

Quality Gate Alerts:

  • Preclinical only

Methodological Considerations:

  • Open-label design — placebo effect not excluded

Abstract: Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects over half a billion people worldwide. Current pharmacologic treatments offer limited efficacy and carry substantial risks, warranting the development of safe and effective alternatives. This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of VER-01 in CLBP. It enrolled 820 adults with CLBP (VER-01, n = 394; placebo, n = 426) and included a double-blind 12-week treatment phase (phase A), a 6-month open-label extension (phase B), followed by either a 6-month continuation (phase C) or randomized withdrawal (phase D). The primary endpoint of phase A was a change in mean numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity, with a change in total neuropathic pain symptom inventory (NPSI) score as a key secondary endpoint in participants with a neuropathic pain component (PainDETECT > 18). The primary endpoint for phase D was time to treatment failure. The study met its primary endpoint in phase A, with a mean pain reduction of -1.9 NRS points in the VER-01 group (mean difference (MD) versus placebo = -0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.9 to -0.3; P < 0.001). Pain further decreased to -2.9 NRS points in phase B, with effects sustained through phase C. The study also met its key secondary endpoint of phase A, with a mean NPSI decrease of -14.4 (standard error, 3.3) points from baseline in the VER-01 arm (MD versus placebo = -7.3, 95% CI = -13.2 to -1.3; P = 0.017). Although phase D did not meet its primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.44-1.27; P = 0.288), pain increased significantly more with placebo upon withdrawal (MD = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.0-1.0; P = 0.034). In phase A, the incidence of adverse events-mostly mild to moderate and transient-was higher with VER-01 than with placebo (83.3% versus 67.3%; P < 0.001). VER-01 was well-tolerated, with no signs of dependence or withdrawal. VER-01 shows potential as a new, safe and effective treatment for CLBP. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04

Full Article  |  PubMed  |  PMC Full Text