Converging neurotrophic-immune signaling in autism spectrum disorder
Table of Contents
- Klotho, GDNF, IGF-1, and GLP-1 Signaling Pathways in Autism
- What You’ll Learn
- Abstract
- Study at a Glance
- Study Snapshot
- Study Facts Table
- What Researchers Actually Did
- Key Findings: Primary Outcomes
- Key Findings: Secondary Outcomes and Subgroup Analyses
- Results: Adverse Events and Safety Profile
- Statistical Approach and Rigor
- Clinical Takeaway
- Why This Matters Clinically
- CED Clinical Relevance
- Clinical Insight
- Fits What We Already Know
- What This Study Teaches Us
- What It Does Not Show
- Fits the Broader Conversation
- Teaches Us: Families
- Teaches Us: Clinicians
- Read This Paper Through Nine Different Lenses
- Overview
- Patient Takeaway
- Clinician’s POV
- A Skeptical Read
- Study Critic
- Compared to Past Research
- Practical Considerations
- Future Directions
- Misreadings & Bad-Faith Takes
- What are the four signaling pathways discussed in the review?
- Which pathway has direct clinical trial evidence in ASD?
- What are the common downstream hubs for these pathways?
- How does GLP-1 receptor agonism potentially benefit ASD patients?
- What is the current status of Klotho modulation as a therapeutic approach for ASD?
- How does dysregulation of these signaling systems affect hippocampal function in ASD?
- What are the adverse events associated with IGF-1 therapy in pediatric populations?
- How does the review propose these pathways contribute to ASD heterogeneity?
- What is the role of GDNF/GFRA-1 axis in maintaining synaptic integrity?
- What is the significance of multi-omics analyses in linking IGF1R genetic burden to ASD risk?
- Read next
- Read This Paper Through Nine Different Lenses
Klotho, GDNF, IGF-1, and GLP-1 Signaling Pathways in Autism
Neurotrophic Signaling
IGF-1 Therapy
GLP-1 Receptor Agonists
Precision Medicine
What You’ll Learn
- How four trophic and metabolic signaling pathways, Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1, converge on the same intracellular cascades implicated in ASD
- Why IGF-1 currently holds the strongest translational evidence, including clinical trial data in syndromic ASD, while the other three pathways remain largely preclinical or mechanistic
- What the evidence gradient from clinically supported to mechanistically speculative means for prescribing and patient counseling today
- How a systems-biology perspective on these interconnected pathways could reshape biomarker development and stratified therapy in ASD
TL;DR: Among four neurotrophic-metabolic pathways reviewed in ASD, IGF-1 has direct clinical trial support in syndromic forms of the disorder; Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, and GLP-1 remain mechanistically plausible but lack robust human causal evidence, and conflating hypothesis with proof would be premature.
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous neurodevelopmental condition characterized by deficits in social communication and restricted, repetitive behaviors. Although traditionally linked to synaptic protein dysfunction and neurotransmitter imbalance, growing evidence suggests that broader intracellular signaling networks critically regulate the neurodevelopmental processes disrupted in ASD. This review synthesizes current evidence on four interconnected signaling pathways, Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1, and examines their potential roles in ASD pathophysiology within a unified mechanistic framework. These pathways regulate fundamental processes, including neuronal survival, synaptogenesis, dendritic maturation, myelination, modulation of oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and metabolic homeostasis. Importantly, they converge on shared intracellular cascades such as PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, and Wnt/β-catenin, which are increasingly implicated in ASD-related abnormalities in synaptic plasticity and circuit organization. Experimental models demonstrate that dysregulation of these signaling systems can impair hippocampal function, alter excitatory-inhibitory balance, and disrupt structural connectivity. Among them, IGF-1 has shown promising translational potential in clinical trials for syndromic ASD, while GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation represent emerging therapeutic avenues. The GDNF/GFRA-1 axis further highlights the importance of trophic support in maintaining synaptic integrity and neuronal resilience. By integrating molecular, preclinical, and clinical findings, this review proposes that convergent dysregulation of trophic and metabolic signaling pathways may contribute to ASD heterogeneity. A systems-level understanding of these interconnected mechanisms may facilitate biomarker development and support the advancement of stratified, pathway-targeted therapeutic strategies.
Want to apply this research to your care?
CED Clinic translates emerging research into individualized clinical care. Dr. Caplan has treated 30,000+ patients.
Book a consultation →Study at a Glance
| Parameter | Detail |
|---|---|
| Design | Narrative integrative review |
| Pathways Reviewed | Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, GLP-1 |
| Primary Aim | Synthesize molecular, preclinical, and clinical evidence linking these four pathways to ASD pathophysiology |
| Key Clinical Finding | IGF-1 is the only pathway among the four with direct clinical trial evidence in ASD (Phelan-McDermid syndrome); the others remain at mechanistic or early translational stages |
| Common Downstream Hubs | PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin |
| Funding | Not applicable (no external funding declared) |
| COI | Authors declare no competing interests |
Study Snapshot
| Pathway | Strongest Evidence Type | ASD-Specific Human Data? | Therapeutic Stage |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGF-1 | Randomized clinical trials (syndromic ASD) | Yes (Phelan-McDermid, Rett, Fragile X) | Translational |
| GLP-1 | Preclinical + Mendelian randomization | Limited (case reports; one MR study) | Early translational |
| GDNF/GFRA-1 | Mechanistic + small observational studies | Indirect (altered GDNF levels in ASD cohorts) | Preclinical |
| Klotho | Mechanistic (animal, in vitro) | Minimal (one small Iraqi biomarker study) | Hypothesis-generating |
Study Facts Table
| Field | Detail |
|---|---|
| Authors | Verma J, Singh RK, Paul S, Gupta S, Gupta AK, Sharma AK, Kumar M, Mehan S, Samant R, Tongra M |
| Journal | Metabolic Brain Disease |
| Year Published | 2026 (online May 19, 2026) |
| Study Design | Narrative integrative review |
| Pathways Reviewed | Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, GLP-1 |
| Downstream Hubs | PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin |
| IGF-1 Clinical Trial Key Result | In Phelan-McDermid syndrome (SHANK3 haploinsufficiency), recombinant IGF-1 was well tolerated and associated with improvements in sensory responsiveness, repetitive behaviors, and hyperactivity across two crossover trials (n=9 each; Kolevzon et al. 2014, 2022) |
| GLP-1 Preclinical Key Result | Semaglutide (60 µg/kg/day × 6 weeks) reduced autism-like behaviors in BTBR mice and restored DNA damage/repair markers and oxidative balance (Hussein et al. 2024) |
| Klotho Human Data | Serum soluble Klotho (S-KLα) lower in 100 ASD children vs. 100 controls (AUC 0.888); negative correlation with MDA (Kucher and Allwsh 2025) |
| Adverse Events | Not a safety trial; IGF-1 was generally well tolerated in pediatric trials; GLP-1 RA safety profiles established in metabolic disease populations |
| Funding | Not applicable |
| COI | None declared |
What Researchers Actually Did
Verma and colleagues conducted a narrative integrative review synthesizing molecular, preclinical, and available clinical evidence across four signaling systems: Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1. The authors mapped each pathway’s receptor biology, downstream intracellular cascades, brain expression patterns, and developmental dynamics, then positioned each within the context of ASD pathophysiology. They drew on animal models, human genetic and biomarker studies, in vitro experiments, and clinical trial data to build a unified mechanistic framework arguing that convergent dysregulation of trophic and metabolic signaling, rather than single-gene or single-transmitter defects, may explain a portion of ASD biological heterogeneity.
A structured evidence summary table catalogued 11 preclinical and clinical datasets covering interventions ranging from recombinant IGF-1 in Phelan-McDermid syndrome to semaglutide in BTBR mice to exenatide in LPS-exposed rats. The authors explicitly graded the four pathways by translational strength, positioning IGF-1 as clinically supported, GLP-1 as early translational, GDNF/GFRA-1 as preclinical, and Klotho as hypothesis-generating. Throughout, shared downstream nodes, particularly PI3K/Akt/mTOR and MAPK/ERK, were highlighted as potential network hubs linking these otherwise distinct ligand-receptor systems.
Key Findings: Primary Outcomes
- IGF-1 (strongest evidence): Two crossover trials in Phelan-McDermid syndrome (n=9 each) found recombinant IGF-1 well tolerated, with reported improvements in sensory responsiveness and repetitive behaviors; one trial showed gains in social impairment scores and reduced hyperactivity. Neither trial reported statistically significant change across all primary endpoints.
- GLP-1 (preclinical signal): Semaglutide in BTBR mice (60 µg/kg/day × 6 weeks) markedly reduced autism-like behaviors and restored DNA damage/repair pathways and oxidative balance. A pharmacogenetic Mendelian randomization study reported genetically proxied GLP-1R activation associated with lower ASD risk (OR approximately 0.55), though the authors acknowledge this is assumption-dependent indirect inference.
- GDNF/GFRA-1 (observational): Plasma GDNF increases following auditory integration therapy in ASD individuals correlated with decreases in SRS and CARS severity scores. Conditional deletion of GFRA-1 in forebrain neurons in mice impaired dendritic branching, spine density, and pattern-separation tasks. No interventional human data exist.
- Klotho (biomarker signal only): One small study (100 ASD children vs. 100 controls in Iraq) found lower serum soluble Klotho (AUC 0.888 for discriminating ASD) with a negative correlation with malondialdehyde. No causal or interventional human data exist.
- Shared downstream convergence: All four pathways engage PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, and/or Wnt/β-catenin. The authors propose that network-level dysregulation at these shared hubs, rather than pathway-specific defects, may generate ASD heterogeneity.
Key Findings: Secondary Outcomes and Subgroup Analyses
- IGF-1 trials in Rett syndrome (MECP2 mutations, n=12 girls; mecasermin 240 µg/kg BID × 17 weeks) reported increased CSF IGF-1 levels, improved apnea measures, and improved anxiety scores, with small sample size limiting inference.
- Trofinetide (an IGF-1 derivative) in a Phase III Rett syndrome trial (n=208) achieved improvements in RSBQ and CGI-I scores but was associated with diarrhea and vomiting.
- 4-hydroxyisoleucine (a natural activator of IGF-1 and GLP-1 signaling) administered orally in a propionic acid rat ASD model (50 and 100 mg/kg) improved behavioral deficits, neuroinflammation, neurotransmitter balance, and white-matter histology.
- Multi-omics analyses in human cohorts (Chinese Han and SFARI SPARK) linked IGF1R genetic burden to ASD risk and identified IGF-1R enrichment in parvalbumin interneurons, consistent with an excitatory-inhibitory imbalance mechanism.
- A single adolescent case report described reductions in compulsive eating and behavioral improvements with liraglutide (titrated to 2.4 mg/day × 36 weeks) in an ASD individual; no generalizability can be inferred.
Results: Adverse Events and Safety Profile
This review does not report primary safety data. The referenced IGF-1 trials document generally favorable tolerability in pediatric populations with neurodevelopmental disorders. Trofinetide was associated with diarrhea and vomiting. GLP-1 receptor agonists carry well-characterized safety profiles from metabolic disease registrations. The authors flag theoretical long-term risks of IGF-1 (excessive cell growth, cancer) and note that optimal dosing, treatment windows, and pediatric safety data for GLP-1 receptor agonists in ASD populations remain unanswered. Klotho and GDNF-targeted interventions have no ASD-specific safety data.
Statistical Approach and Rigor
As a narrative review, this paper does not apply meta-analytic statistics or formal risk-of-bias tools. The authors summarize findings qualitatively and organize evidence by pathway and study type. The evidence table (Table 1) is descriptive rather than quantitatively synthesized. No PRISMA methodology is declared, no systematic search strategy is reported, and no formal GRADE assessment is applied. The review acknowledges heterogeneity across study designs, species, and populations without quantifying it. The Mendelian randomization data for GLP-1R (OR approximately 0.55 for ASD risk) is cited from a single external study without meta-analytic pooling or sensitivity analysis. The Klotho biomarker AUC of 0.888 derives from one small regional cohort of uncertain representativeness.
Clinical Takeaway
For the clinician seeing patients with ASD today, the practical message is narrow but real: recombinant IGF-1 (mecasermin) has the strongest biological rationale and the most human trial data, specifically in SHANK3-related syndromes such as Phelan-McDermid. GLP-1 receptor agonists, already prescribed for metabolic comorbidities in ASD, may carry neurotrophic and anti-inflammatory benefits worth tracking in ongoing evaluations, though controlled ASD-specific trials are absent. Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 are not yet clinical instruments; they are research constructs with mechanistic plausibility but no human interventional data. Counseling families about any of these pathways as established treatments would exceed the evidence.
Clinical Bottom Line: IGF-1 is the one pathway in this review with controlled human trial data in ASD; the remaining three are mechanistically interesting but not yet clinically actionable outside of research settings.
Why This Matters Clinically
ASD research has long centered on synaptic scaffolding proteins, GABA/glutamate balance, and ion channel dysfunction. This review makes a conceptually useful argument: those targets may be downstream of upstream trophic and metabolic signaling failures that are pharmacologically accessible through agents already in clinical use or development. If even one of these pathways, most plausibly IGF-1 or GLP-1 signaling, proves modifiable in well-characterized ASD subgroups, it opens a stratification framework: rather than treating autism generically, clinicians could identify patients with low IGF-1 bioavailability, impaired GDNF signaling, or neuroinflammatory profiles and direct targeted therapy accordingly. That goal is worth pursuing. The distance between that goal and the current evidence, however, is considerable.
CED Clinical Relevance
At CED Clinic, patients often present with questions about metabolic and trophic interventions, including GLP-1 receptor agonists that are increasingly discussed across neurological and psychiatric indications. This review provides a structured molecular rationale for why these pathways are biologically plausible in ASD, while also making explicit what is not yet known. For patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists for metabolic comorbidities, the preclinical and early genetic evidence adds mechanistic context without changing prescribing decisions. For families asking about IGF-1, the review accurately conveys that syndromic ASD trials show signals of benefit but that idiopathic ASD remains unanswered. Klotho and GDNF discussions belong firmly in the context of future research, not current clinical planning.
Clinical Insight
Before framing any of these four pathways as a therapeutic target for a specific patient, establish whether that patient has a genetically characterized ASD subtype. The IGF-1 clinical evidence is syndromic-specific; extrapolating to idiopathic ASD is not supported by the data reviewed here. Biomarker measurement (serum IGF-1, soluble Klotho, GDNF levels) in clinical practice lacks validated reference ranges and clinical interpretation frameworks in ASD populations.
Fits What We Already Know
The review situates itself within a well-established literature linking PI3K/Akt/mTOR hyperactivation to ASD, particularly tuberous sclerosis complex and PTEN-related syndromes (cited: Sharma and Mehan 2021; Pagani et al. 2021). The role of BDNF/TrkB in synaptic plasticity and its disruption in ASD provides an established precedent for trophic signaling as a disease-relevant target. The authors correctly note that IGF-1’s mechanism, restoring AMPA receptor function and LTP in Shank3-deficient mice (Bozdagi et al. 2013; Shcheglovitov et al. 2013), aligns with the broader synaptic deficit model of ASD. The inclusion of GLP-1 extends a growing literature on metabolic-neurological interface signaling that has been productive in Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease research (Athauda et al. 2017; Gejl et al. 2016), though the extrapolation to neurodevelopmental disorders requires more than mechanistic analogy.
What This Study Teaches Us
The review offers a structured, accessible map of four signaling pathways that share downstream molecular real estate with each other and with established ASD risk mechanisms. Its core contribution is organizational: demonstrating that Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1 are not isolated curiosities but members of an interconnected network whose convergence on PI3K/Akt and related cascades makes them candidates for systems-level investigation. It also communicates honestly, if not always prominently, that the evidence gradient is steep: one pathway has human trial data, one has preclinical signals and genetic epidemiology, and two have mechanistic plausibility and little else.
What It Does Not Show
- It does not demonstrate that modulating any of these pathways improves outcomes in idiopathic ASD.
- It does not establish causality between pathway dysregulation and ASD symptomatology in humans.
- The IGF-1 trial data cited are from small crossover studies in a specific genetic syndrome; these results do not generalize to the broader ASD population.
- The Klotho and GDNF biomarker associations reported in humans are from small, single-cohort observational studies with no causal inference.
- The Mendelian randomization finding for GLP-1R and ASD risk is indirect, assumption-dependent, and requires clinical trial validation.
- The review does not address long-term safety of any of these interventions in pediatric neurodevelopmental populations.
Fits the Broader Conversation
This review joins a growing body of work arguing that ASD heterogeneity demands a shift from symptom-targeted to mechanism-based therapeutics. It adds to an emerging discussion, already active in the IGF-1 and mTOR literature, about stratifying ASD by biological pathway rather than behavioral phenotype alone. The inclusion of GLP-1 is timely, given the rapid expansion of GLP-1 receptor agonist indications and the parallel interest in their central nervous system effects. Whether Klotho and GDNF will follow IGF-1 from mechanistic candidate to clinical target depends on whether the field can generate the longitudinal, well-characterized cohort data that this review, to its credit, explicitly identifies as missing.
Teaches Us: Families
Scientists are investigating whether certain signaling proteins in the brain, molecules that act like chemical messengers supporting neuron growth, survival, and connection, may be disrupted in some people with autism. This review looks at four of those proteins: Klotho, GDNF, IGF-1, and GLP-1. Of the four, only IGF-1 has been tested in human clinical trials for autism, and those trials were in a specific genetic type of autism called Phelan-McDermid syndrome. The results suggested IGF-1 was safe and produced some improvements in behavior, but the studies were small. The other three proteins are being studied in animals or cells right now, not yet in people with autism. This research is promising because it suggests autism may involve disruptions in biological pathways that could eventually be treated with targeted medicines, but we are not yet there for most of these pathways.
Teaches Us: Clinicians
This review constructs a molecular framework linking four trophic-metabolic signaling axes to ASD pathophysiology through shared downstream nodes (PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin). For the clinician, the operationally relevant takeaway is the evidence gradient: IGF-1 has phase II/III crossover trial data in SHANK3-related and MECP2-related syndromes; GLP-1 receptor agonists have preclinical signals, one Mendelian randomization study, and a case report; GDNF/GFRA-1 has small observational human correlations; Klotho has one small biomarker study. The review identifies five discrete translational gaps: absence of longitudinal pathway data in characterized ASD cohorts, lack of validated CNS biomarkers for stratification, no powered idiopathic ASD trials for any pathway, unknown pediatric safety profiles for GLP-1 agonists in this context, and no human interventional data for Klotho or GDNF/GFRA-1. Biomarker-guided stratification (IGF-1 serum levels, IGF1R expression, downstream p-
Read This Paper Through Nine Different Lenses
The same evidence can produce very different conclusions depending on the question being asked. Explore this study through multiple physician-guided interpretive frameworks.
Overview
This review synthesizes evidence on four interconnected signaling pathways in ASD, highlighting their roles in neuronal survival and synaptic integrity. IGF-1 has clinical trial support, while others are at preclinical stages.
The convergence of these pathways on shared intracellular cascades suggests a network-level dysregulation underlying ASD heterogeneity.
- IGF-1 shows promising clinical data in syndromic ASD.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation are emerging therapeutic avenues.
- GDNF/GFRA-1 axis supports synaptic integrity and neuronal resilience.
Patient Takeaway
For patients with ASD, recombinant IGF-1 has shown improvements in sensory responsiveness and repetitive behaviors in clinical trials. GLP-1 receptor agonists may offer additional benefits but require further study.
Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 are currently under research and not yet available as treatments.
- IGF-1 therapy shows promise for syndromic ASD.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists have potential neurotrophic benefits.
- Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 remain at the hypothesis-generating stage.
Clinician’s POV
Clinicians can consider recombinant IGF-1 for patients with syndromic ASD based on clinical trial data. GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered for their potential neurotrophic and anti-inflammatory effects, though more research is needed.
Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 are not yet clinically supported but warrant further investigation.
- IGF-1 therapy has clinical trial support in syndromic ASD.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists show promise but lack controlled ASD-specific trials.
- Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 remain at the hypothesis-generating stage.
A Skeptical Read
While IGF-1 has clinical trial support, other pathways like GLP-1, Klotho, and GDNF/GFRA-1 remain at preclinical or mechanistic stages. More research is needed to establish their efficacy in ASD.
The convergence of these pathways on shared intracellular cascades suggests a complex network-level dysregulation underlying ASD heterogeneity.
- IGF-1 has the strongest clinical evidence.
- GLP-1, Klotho, and GDNF/GFRA-1 lack robust human causal evidence.
- Future research should focus on translating preclinical findings to clinical applications.
Study Critic
The review synthesizes evidence from various study designs but lacks formal risk-of-bias assessment. The evidence gradient from clinically supported to mechanistically speculative should be considered when prescribing and counseling patients.
Future studies should address heterogeneity across study designs, species, and populations to strengthen the evidence base.
- The review synthesizes evidence without formal risk-of-bias tools.
- Evidence gradient varies from clinical support to mechanistic speculation.
- Heterogeneity across studies limits definitive conclusions.
Compared to Past Research
Previous research has linked synaptic protein dysfunction and neurotransmitter imbalance to ASD. This review expands on these findings by examining the roles of Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1 in broader intracellular signaling networks.
The convergence of these pathways on shared cascades suggests a more comprehensive understanding of ASD pathophysiology.
- Previous research focused on synaptic protein dysfunction.
- This review expands to include broader intracellular signaling.
- Convergence on shared cascades offers new insights into ASD.
Practical Considerations
Clinicians can consider recombinant IGF-1 for patients with syndromic ASD based on clinical trial data. GLP-1 receptor agonists may be considered for their potential neurotrophic and anti-inflammatory effects, though more research is needed.
Patient counseling should reflect the current evidence levels of each pathway.
- IGF-1 therapy has clinical trial support.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists show promise but lack controlled ASD-specific trials.
- Klotho and GDNF/GFRA-1 remain at the hypothesis-generating stage.
Future Directions
Future research should focus on translating preclinical findings to clinical applications, particularly for GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation. Multi-omics approaches can further elucidate the roles of these pathways in ASD.
Addressing heterogeneity across studies will be crucial for developing stratified therapeutic strategies.
- Translate preclinical findings to clinical applications.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation are emerging therapies.
- Multi-omics approaches can elucidate pathway roles.
- Address study heterogeneity for stratified therapy.
Misreadings & Bad-Faith Takes
It is important not to conflate hypothesis with proof. While GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation show promise, they lack robust human causal evidence. IGF-1 therapy has the strongest clinical support among the four pathways.
Patient counseling should reflect these varying levels of evidence.
- Do not conflate hypothesis with proof.
- GLP-1 receptor agonists and Klotho modulation lack robust human data.
- IGF-1 therapy has the strongest clinical evidence.
Have thoughts on this? Share it:
What are the four signaling pathways discussed in the review?
The review discusses Klotho, GDNF/GFRA-1, IGF-1, and GLP-1 signaling pathways.
Which pathway has direct clinical trial evidence in ASD?
IGF-1 is the only pathway with direct clinical trial evidence in syndromic forms of ASD.
What are the common downstream hubs for these pathways?
The common downstream hubs include PI3K/Akt, MAPK/ERK, mTOR, and Wnt/β-catenin.
How does GLP-1 receptor agonism potentially benefit ASD patients?
GLP-1 receptor agonists may offer neurotrophic and anti-inflammatory benefits in ASD, though controlled trials are needed.
What is the current status of Klotho modulation as a therapeutic approach for ASD?
Klotho modulation remains at the hypothesis-generating stage with minimal human data.
How does dysregulation of these signaling systems affect hippocampal function in ASD?
Dysregulation can impair hippocampal function, alter excitatory-inhibitory balance, and disrupt structural connectivity.
What are the adverse events associated with IGF-1 therapy in pediatric populations?
IGF-1 is generally well tolerated in pediatric trials, but Trofinetide was associated with diarrhea and vomiting.
How does the review propose these pathways contribute to ASD heterogeneity?
The review suggests that convergent dysregulation of trophic and metabolic signaling pathways may explain some of the biological diversity in ASD.
What is the role of GDNF/GFRA-1 axis in maintaining synaptic integrity?
The GDNF/GFRA-1 axis supports synaptic integrity and neuronal resilience, which are crucial for normal brain function.
What is the significance of multi-omics analyses in linking IGF1R genetic burden to ASD risk?
Multi-omics analyses link IGF1R genetic burden to ASD risk and identify IGF-1R enrichment in parvalbumin interneurons, suggesting a role in excitatory-inhibitory imbalance.


