Research study · Journal of Cannabis Research · 2026
Sex-specific association between low oral doses of cannabidiol (CBD) and plasma concentration of anandamide (AEA), N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) and N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA) in healthy occasional cannabis users
Verified on PubMed Oxford CEBM Level 1B: Randomized Controlled Trial
A 2026 randomized controlled trial in Journal of Cannabis Research tested cbd in inflammation. The results were mixed, and the effect was seen only in women. This study suggests that low-dose oral CBD may alter certain metabolic signals in occasional users, but because the effect was limited to women and observed in a healthy population.
In plain language
Study overview
Researchers studied healthy adults who use cannabis now and then. Each person took several small amounts of a plant-derived calming compound, cannabidiol, along with a sugar-free oil placebo, on different days, and had blood drawn over several hours.
Findings
The results were mixed, and the effect was seen only in women. In women, the amounts of two natural body chemicals linked to inflammation and metabolism were lower after some doses of the compound than after the placebo, while men showed no such change.
Explore Dr. Caplan's interactive tool detailing cytochrome P450 pathways, clinical titration intervals, and physician surveillance rules.
The deeper readScientific analysis
Background: Cannabidiol (CBD), a phytocannabinoid produced by Cannabis sativa, is widely consumed and interacts with components of the endocannabinoid system through indirect and complex mechanisms. How CBD influences endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide (AEA), and related N-acylethanolamines like N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) and N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA), remains poorly understood. This study investigates the acute impact of marketed CBD doses on plasmatic levels of these signaling lipids in occasional cannabis users. Methods: In a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial, 70 healthy volunteers received ten sequences of four oral CBD doses (20, 50, 100, 200 mg) and placebo. Blood was sampled at baseline and five timepoints post-dose. Plasma AEA, PEA, and OEA were quantified by LC-MS, and dose-response assessed with linear mixed-effects models on plasma concentrations (model 1) and Area Under the Curve to increase (AUCi, model 2). Results: Model 2 revealed a significant effect of CBD dose on AUCi of PEA and OEA, but not AEA. Placebo was associated with significantly higher AUCi than the 50 mg dose (p < 0.05) and trended higher than the 200 mg dose (p < 0.10). Sex emerged as a significant factor: reductions in AUCi were driven by female participants, confirmed at 50 mg and 200 mg (only PEA) compared to placebo. No corresponding effects were observed in males. All plasma levels decreased overall throughout each visit, at every dose of CBD and placebo. Conclusions: Among healthy adults who consume cannabis occasionally, low-dose oral CBD formulations significantly decreased cumulative plasma levels of PEA and OEA in a female-specific fashion, confirming the importance of sex-differences in cannabinoid response.
The paper
Citation
Abboud A, Chester LA, Hébert FO, Jutras-Aswad D Sex-specific association between low oral doses of cannabidiol (CBD) and plasma concentration of anandamide (AEA), N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) and N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA) in healthy occasional cannabis users. Journal of Cannabis Research (2026). PubMed 41514385 · DOI
Read the abstract as published
BACKGROUND: Cannabidiol (CBD), a phytocannabinoid produced by Cannabis sativa, is widely consumed and interacts with components of the endocannabinoid system, including enzymes and receptors, through indirect and complex mechanisms. However, how CBD influences endogenous cannabinoids such as anandamide (AEA), and related N-acylethanolamines like N-palmitoylethanolamine (PEA) and N-oleoylethanolamine (OEA), remains poorly understood. This study investigates the acute impact of marketed CBD doses on the plasmatic levels of these signaling lipids in occasional cannabis users, addressing a critical gap in understanding the biological effects of low-dose CBD in non-therapeutic contexts. METHODS: In a triple-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial, 70 healthy volunteers received ten sequences of four oral CBD doses (20, 50, 100, 200 mg) and placebo. Blood was sampled at baseline and five timepoints post-dose. Plasma AEA, PEA, and OEA were quantified by LC–MS, and dose–response assessed with linear mixed-effects models on plasma concentrations (model 1) and Area Under the Curve to increase (AUCi, model 2), including participant ID (nested in sequence) as random effect, and visit, sequence, sex, and baseline levels as fixed effects. RESULTS: Model 2 revealed a significant effect of CBD dose on AUCi of PEA and OEA, but not AEA. Pairwise comparisons showed that placebo was associated with significantly higher AUCi values than the 50 mg dose (p < 0.05; moderate effect sizes), and trended higher than the 200 mg dose (p < 0.10; small-to-moderate effect sizes). No differences were observed for other dose contrasts. Importantly, sex emerged as a significant factor: sub-group analyses indicated that these reductions in AUCi were driven by female participants, with lower PEA and OEA exposure confirmed at both 50 mg and 200 mg (only PEA) compared to placebo. No corresponding effects were observed in males. All plasma levels decreased overall throughout each visit, at every dose of CBD and placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that among healthy adults who consume cannabis occasionally, low-dose oral CBD formulations were able to significantly decrease the cumulative plasma levels of PEA and OEA in a female-specific fashion, confirming the importance of sex-differences in cannabinoid response, and emphasizing the relevance of a personalized approach to cannabis consumption and its effects, as well as public health messaging. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov, registration: NCT05407285, Registration date: 2022–06-02).
Abstract text as indexed by PubMed for this identifier.
Limitations the authors noted
2-AG was not measured due to budget limitations. Limited number of timepoints, particularly for AEA (only T0, T120, T360 measured). Standardized high-fat meal independently alters NAE levels and confounds interpretation; meal completion was not documented. Exploratory analysis not designed or powered for mechanistic claims; sex-stratified analyses are post-hoc. Caffeine use, nicotine use, body fat, genetics and menstrual cycle were not accounted for. Functional or behavioral significance of observed plasma changes was not determined; magnitude of change was modest. Single-dose acute design; results may not generalize to chronic use or other populations. Synthetic, pharmaceutically produced CBD in MCT oil, which may not reflect commercial product variability.
In practice
Why this matters
This study suggests that low-dose oral CBD may alter certain metabolic signals in occasional users, but because the effect was limited to women and observed in a healthy population rather than those seeking treatment, it does not currently change clinical practice for cannabis clinics.
Frequently asked questions
Clinical Questions & Answers
What were the primary clinical findings regarding CBD and Inflammation?
The results were mixed, and the effect was seen only in women. In women, the amounts of two natural body chemicals linked to inflammation and metabolism were lower after some doses of the compound than after the placebo, while men showed no such change.
What study limitations or clinical safeguards should patients keep in mind?
2-AG was not measured due to budget limitations. Limited number of timepoints, particularly for AEA (only T0, T120, T360 measured). Standardized high-fat meal independently alters NAE levels and confounds interpretation; meal completion was not documented.
Browse related research
Condition: Inflammation Condition: Pharmacokinetics Topic: CBD Topic: Oleoylethanolamide Topic: Palmitoylethanolamide
Related on CED Clinic
Back to Daily Research and Patient Questions
Reviewed by Dr. Caplan on October 22, 2026.
This page is general education about a published study. It is not medical advice and does not create a doctor-patient relationship. For care specific to you, book a consultation.