Harmony Trial: What the NTI164 Autism Study Actually Reported
#67
Notable Clinical Interest
Emerging findings or policy developments worth monitoring closely.
This randomized clinical trial matters for clinicians and their patients as it provides evidence on the effectiveness of low-THC full-spectrum cannabis extract in managing symptoms of moderate-to-severe autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in children aged 8 to 17. The findings could potentially expand treatment options for this patient population, contributing to improved clinical practice and patient care.
In the Harmony trial, 61 children and adolescents aged 8 to 17 with Level II or III autism spectrum disorder were randomized to NTI164, a full-spectrum extract containing less than 0.3% THC, or placebo for 8 weeks, and 54 were analyzed. The prespecified primary endpoint was clinician-rated overall severity on the CGI-S, which improved relative to placebo. On the caregiver-rated Social Responsiveness Scale, the total T-score did not reach statistical significance (least squares mean difference -2.71, p = 0.055); two of its five subscales separated. The largest effects in the trial were on anxiety and mood, which are associated rather than core symptoms. The trial applied no adjustment for multiplicity to secondary outcomes.
This is a small industry-funded trial with one positive primary endpoint, and it deserves to be read at that size. The paper is titled as improving core symptoms, but its own results section reports the social responsiveness total as not statistically significant. The effects that reached significance most clearly were on anxiety and mood. That is a meaningful finding for families, and it is a different claim from changing the core features of autism. Replication by an independent group, with a multiplicity-adjusted analysis, is the next thing to wait for.
🔬 A randomized placebo-controlled trial in children and adolescents with moderate-to-severe autism spectrum disorder reported improvement on its primary measure of overall clinical severity, with the clearest secondary effects on anxiety and mood rather than on core social communication measures. However, it’s crucial to acknowledge the complexity of this finding, as confounders such as individual response variability, concurrent medication use, and long-term effects remain to be fully explored. In clinical practice, healthcare providers may consider discussing the potential benefits and risks associated with cannabis therapy in managing symptoms of ASD, while emphasizing the need for ongoing monitoring and adjustment of treatment plans based on individual patient responses.
💬 Join the Conversation
Have a question about how this applies to your situation?
Ask Dr. Caplan →
Want to discuss this topic with other patients and caregivers?
Join the forum discussion →
Have thoughts on this? Share it:
Funding and author affiliation: the trial was funded by Fenix Innovation Group and Neurotech International; the first three authors are affiliated with Fenix Innovation Group.
📄 Printable 1-Page Physician Patient Guide
Download or print Dr. Benjamin Caplan’s official clinical reference guide to share with your healthcare team.

