Treating clinicians
Diagnose, prescribe, perform procedures, and direct active treatment within the services they provide.
Private physician advisory
Private physician advisory adds continuity and independent physician judgment around a medical situation that has become difficult to follow or decide.
I follow the questions we have agreed matter and remember where the last decision left off. When a question belongs back with the treating physician, I say so.
Diagnose, prescribe, perform procedures, and direct active treatment within the services they provide.
Follows agreed medical questions, clarifies uncertainty and tradeoffs, and preserves the thread across decisions.
Level of continuity
The difference is how much of the medical story I am agreeing to follow over time.
For one defined problem or connected set of decisions that needs continuity.
A written physician synthesis of what changed, what I am following, and what may matter next.
I follow new evidence when it is relevant to the questions within our work.
One scheduled 45-minute video or telephone review.
Defined channels for records, questions, and important updates.
For a medical story changing across clinicians or over time.
The written brief, Research Watch, private channels, and monthly physician review remain included.
Up to 90 minutes for a deeper review of the active medical picture and the decisions ahead.
Up to 60 minutes by video or telephone in addition to the in-person review.
Relevant diagnoses, medications, specialists, testing, and prior decisions are held in a wider view.
Preparation, follow-up, and selected lawfully obtained recordings may be reviewed when materially relevant to our work.
The value is having a physician remember where the last decision left off.
What I do each month
And, sometimes just as important, when it has not.
The written synthesis
Each month, I write down the questions within our advisory work, what changed, and what may matter next. The brief is deliberately selective.
When materially relevant new evidence changes the picture, raises a useful question, or deserves discussion with the treating team, I explain why.
Sometimes the useful conclusion is that nothing new changes the current strategy.
Private physician access
A brief update, a detailed written question, and a substantive medical discussion should not be treated as the same kind of communication.
For a brief question or important update that is difficult to hold until the next review. It is not continuously monitored or emergency coverage.
For records, written context, and questions I should understand before responding. Detailed medical material belongs here rather than in a string of texts.
For competing options or substantive questions that deserve the chart open and protected physician time.
Some questions take two minutes. Others deserve the chart open and enough time to think. I do not pretend those are the same kind of communication.
Continuity
A specialist may know one part of the picture exceptionally well. A hospital team may know this admission. Primary care may hold years of history but have limited time to reconstruct every active question.
My advisory role is to remember the decisions, uncertainties, and priorities I have agreed to follow so that each new conversation does not begin from zero.
Advisory fees
You do not need to decide which level fits before reaching out.
For one defined problem or related set of medical decisions that needs continued physician perspective.
For a changing medical story involving multiple clinicians or repeated decisions over time.
Advisory fees are private-pay. Outside medical services and other third-party costs are separate.
Want the practical details?
Read how access, records, treating-team roles, and relationship boundaries work in practice.
Frequently asked questions
No. Primary care, refills, preventive care, and direct treatment remain with your treating clinicians.
Use the dedicated channels for brief updates, records, or written questions. More complicated questions may need a scheduled review.
Urgent medical needs belong with the treating team or emergency services. Advisory is not emergency coverage.
Yes, when it would meaningfully help and appropriate permissions are in place. We can discuss that as part of the advisory plan.
We review whether ongoing support is still useful and whether the current level still fits.
Request a consultation
You do not need a polished medical summary, perfectly organized records, or certainty about which advisory level fits. Tell me what is happening, who is involved, and what has become difficult to follow or decide.