# Endocannabinoid System &#038; Cannabis for Chronic Back Pain Trial

> **Author:** Benjamin Caplan, MD (ABFM Board Certified, MA Lic. #240562, NPI: 1962722637)
> **Publisher:** CED Clinic (https://cedclinic.com)
> **Canonical URL:** https://cedclinic.com/full-spectrum-cannabis-extract-trial-chronic-back-pain/
> **Published:** 2026-03-03T18:25:58-04:00 | **Last Modified / Clinically Audited:** 2026-09-28T12:01:18-04:00
> **Clinical Summary:** Explore the full-spectrum cannabis extract trial evaluating VER-01 for chronic low back pain, showing promising efficacy and safety in a phase 3 study.

---

#### Clinical Takeaway

In this phase 3 trial of 820 adults with chronic low back pain, the full-spectrum cannabis extract VER-01 was evaluated against placebo over 12 weeks with extended follow-up reaching 15 months total. The trial design, including a randomized withdrawal phase, was built to assess both efficacy and durability of effect in a condition where existing medications frequently fall short. Results from this level of clinical evidence carry meaningful weight for patients and clinicians considering cannabis-based options for chronic low back [pain management](https://cedclinic.com/cbd-cbg-topicals-for-eczema/).

### #2 Full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 for chronic low back pain: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.

**Citation:** Karst Matthias et al. *Full-spectrum extract from Cannabis sativa DKJ127 for chronic low back pain: a phase 3 randomized placebo-controlled trial.* Nature medicine. 2025. PMID: 41023483.

**Study type:** Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Multicenter Study  | 
 **Topic area:** Pain  | 
 **CED Score:** 14

Design: 5 Journal: 4 N: 2 Recency: 2 Pop: 2 Human: 1 Risk: -2

 Why This Matters
 This phase 3 trial addresses a critical clinical gap by providing rigorous evidence on cannabis extract efficacy for chronic low back pain, a condition affecting over 500 million people globally where current pharmacotherapies demonstrate inadequate pain relief with significant adverse effect profiles. The 12-week double-blind design with 820 participants and 6-month extension phase establishes the safety and efficacy profile necessary for clinicians to make evidence-based decisions regarding cannabis as an alternative to conventional analgesics and opioids in CLBP management. Given the opioid crisis and limited efficacy of existing treatments, demonstrated efficacy of VER-01 would provide a potentially safer therapeutic option with a more favorable risk-benefit

**Quality Gate Alerts:**

- Preclinical only

**Methodological Considerations:**

- Open-label design — placebo effect not excluded

**Abstract:** Chronic low back pain (CLBP) affects over half a billion people worldwide. Current pharmacologic treatments offer limited efficacy and carry substantial risks, warranting the development of safe and effective alternatives. This multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of VER-01 in CLBP. It enrolled 820 adults with CLBP (VER-01, n = 394; placebo, n = 426) and included a double-blind 12-week treatment phase (phase A), a 6-month open-label extension (phase B), followed by either a 6-month continuation (phase C) or randomized withdrawal (phase D). The primary endpoint of phase A was a change in mean numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity, with a change in total [neuropathic pain](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-for-pain-relief/) symptom inventory (NPSI) score as a key secondary endpoint in participants with a [neuropathic pain](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-for-pain-relief/) component (PainDETECT > 18). The primary endpoint for phase D was time to treatment failure. The study met its primary endpoint in phase A, with a mean pain reduction of -1.9 NRS points in the VER-01 group (mean difference (MD) versus placebo = -0.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.9 to -0.3; P < 0.001). Pain further decreased to -2.9 NRS points in phase B, with effects sustained through phase C. The study also met its key secondary endpoint of phase A, with a mean NPSI decrease of -14.4 (standard error, 3.3) points from baseline in the VER-01 arm (MD versus placebo = -7.3, 95% CI = -13.2 to -1.3; P = 0.017). Although phase D did not meet its primary endpoint (hazard ratio = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.44-1.27; P = 0.288), pain increased significantly more with placebo upon withdrawal (MD = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.0-1.0; P = 0.034). In phase A, the incidence of adverse events-mostly mild to moderate and transient-was higher with VER-01 than with placebo (83.3% versus 67.3%; P < 0.001). VER-01 was well-tolerated, with no signs of dependence or withdrawal. VER-01 shows potential as a new, safe and effective treatment for CLBP. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT04

 Clinical Perspective

This phase 3 trial adds meaningful evidence to the cannabis literature for chronic low back pain, a condition where conventional pharmacotherapy often falls short, though several design considerations warrant careful interpretation. The 12-week double-blind phase provides robust data on efficacy and tolerability, but the mechanism of action in DKJ127’s full-spectrum extract remains incompletely characterized, making it difficult to predict individual patient response or optimize dosing strategies. Notably, the open-label extension phase may introduce bias regarding long-term safety and efficacy profiles, and we lack clarity on whether benefits persist beyond the initial treatment window or how this extract compares to other cannabis formulations already available to patients. Despite these limitations, if efficacy and safety data support approval, VER-01 could offer a non-opioid, potentially lower-risk option for selected patients with CLBP who have failed conventional approaches, provided we establish clear patient selection criteria and implement appropriate monitoring for cannabinoid-related [side effects](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-intoxication-memory-disruption/) and drug interactions in [clinical practice](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-reproductive-health-women-clinical-evidence/).

 |   | 

Further Reading
CED Clinic Blog[Why Cannabis Works](https://cedclinic.com/why-cannabis-works/)
Evidence Watch[Cannabis and Heart Health](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-cardiovascular-health-study/)
CED Clinic Blog[Cannabis for Sleep](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-for-sleep/)

[View on PubMed ↗](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41023483/)[Full Text ↗](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12705446/)[DOI ↗](https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03977-0)

 [https://cedclinic.com/contact/](https://cedclinic.com/contact/)
 

Physician-Led, Whole-Person Care
A doctor who takes the time to truly understand you.
Personal care that starts with listening and is guided by experience and ingenuity.

Health, Longevity, Wellness
One-on-One Cannabis Guidance
Metabolic Balance

 [Leave a Message](https://cedclinic.com/contact/)
 [Metabolic Care](https://cedclinic.com/metabolic/metabolic-how-it-works/)
 [Medical Consulting](https://cedclinic.com/book/)
 [Cannabis Care](https://cedclinic.com/book/)
 

 [https://cedclinic.com/contact/](https://cedclinic.com/contact/)
 

RELATED READING AT CED CLINIC

Continue exploring the evidence

[Endocannabinoid System & Chronic Low Back Pain: Phase 3 Trial Results on Cannabis Sativa Extracts](https://cedclinic.com/phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial-chronic-low-back-pain/)

Detailed results from a phase 3 trial on cannabis sativa extracts for chronic low back pain, providing insights into efficacy and safety.

[Read More](https://cedclinic.com/phase-3-randomized-controlled-trial-chronic-low-back-pain/)

[Cannabis Sativa Extracts for Chronic Low Back Pain: A Phase 3 Randomized Trial](https://cedclinic.com/phase-3-cannabis-trial-chronic-low-back-pain-results/)

Explore the randomized trial assessing cannabis sativa extracts in managing chronic low back pain with clinical evidence.

[Explore Study](https://cedclinic.com/phase-3-cannabis-trial-chronic-low-back-pain-results/)

[Endocannabinoid System Clinical Research: Pain Management Trial](https://cedclinic.com/full-spectrum-cannabis-extract-pain-trial/)

[Clinical research](https://cedclinic.com/cannabis-based-therapies-smoking-cessation/) on the endocannabinoid system's role in [pain management](https://cedclinic.com/cbd-cbg-topicals-for-eczema/), highlighting recent trial findings.

[Learn More](https://cedclinic.com/full-spectrum-cannabis-extract-pain-trial/)

Have thoughts on this? Share it:

[X Share on X](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Endocannabinoid%20System%20%26%20Cannabis%20for%20Chronic%20Back%20Pain%20Trial&url=https%3A%2F%2Fcedclinic.com%2Ffull-spectrum-cannabis-extract-trial-chronic-back-pain%2F) [in Share on LinkedIn](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcedclinic.com%2Ffull-spectrum-cannabis-extract-trial-chronic-back-pain%2F) [Share on BlueSky](https://bsky.app/intent/compose?text=Endocannabinoid%20System%20%26%20Cannabis%20for%20Chronic%20Back%20Pain%20Trial%20https%3A%2F%2Fcedclinic.com%2Ffull-spectrum-cannabis-extract-trial-chronic-back-pain%2F) [Follow on Instagram](https://www.instagram.com/drbenjamincaplan) [Read more on Substack](https://doctorapprovedcannabis.substack.com/) [Subscribe via RSS](https://cedclinic.com/feed/)

 

### Related

---

### Verification & Medical Governance

- **Lead Clinical Author:** Benjamin Caplan, MD
- **Credentials:** Board Certified in Family Medicine (ABFM), Founder & CMO CED Clinic & CED Foundation, Author of *The Doctor-Approved Cannabis Handbook* (Penguin Random House).
- **Clinical Scale:** 350,000+ lifetime evaluations overseen; 81,008-patient Real-World Evidence Registry (`~/.ced_rwe_vault.db`); 125,000+ peer-reviewed study literature observatory (`http://localhost:8768/api/explorer/terminal`).
- **License Verification:** Commonwealth of Massachusetts License #240562 (https://checkahealthlicense.mass.gov/).
- **NPI Registry:** 1962722637 (https://npiregistry.cms.hhs.gov/provider-view/1962722637).
- **Ethics & Data Privacy:** Clinical registry observations adhere strictly to HIPAA Safe Harbor de-identification (45 CFR § 164.514(b)) and criteria for secondary research exemption under 45 CFR § 46.104(d)(4).
